| 05/21/2023 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- Attempts to collect debt not owed
- Debt is not yours
|
|
Web |
|
|
BE ADVISED THAT THIS WILL SERVE AS PUBLIC NOTICE!!!!!!!
Since Public Servant XXXX XXXX XXXX Public Servant XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX AND Marcadis Singer PA deny me MY 5th amendment Constitutional Right to due Process and conspire against my Constitutional Rights 18 U.S.C 241 AND 18 U.S.C 242 and Public Servant XXXX XXXX and Public XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America ( see attachment labeled XXXX XXXX ) I feel its safer and my best interest for me to communicate on this public platform.
Be advised upon Discovery of Facts pertaining to Case No. : XXXX AND Case No. : XXXX I found out that the ONLY NATURAL LIVING BREATHING FLESH AND BLOOD MAN OR WOMAN that can hire AND OR APPOINT legal representation for XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX IS A NATURAL LIVING, BREATHING, FLESH AND BLOOD MAN OR WOMAN THAT CURRENTLY SITS AS A MEMBER ON XXXX XXXX XXXX BOARD OF DIRECTORS !!!!!!! FURTHERMORE, THIS LEGAL REPRESENTATION EITHER A CORPORATION AND MAN OR WOMAN MUST BE LISTED ON XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX CORPORATE MINUTES, IN HEADQUARTERED STATE OF THE CORPORATION WHICH IS NORTH CAROLINA.PLEASE SEE BELOW THE CURRENT LIST OF NAMES 21 TO BE EXACT THAT ARE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEMBERS FOR XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX M. XXXX XXXX XXXX P. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX FURTHERMORE , the only person listed as legal representative for XXXX XXXX XXXX that was appointed by the Board of Directors for XXXX XXXX XXXX, listed on the CORPORATION ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION in North Carolina, AND handles ALL LEGAL MATTERS FOR XXXX XXXX XXXX IS XXXX XXXX XXXX. Meaning MARCADIS SINGER IS FRAUDENTLY REPRESENTING XXXX IN 17TH JUDICAL CIRCUIT COURT!!!! MARCADIS SINGER PA HAD NO CONSENT AND OR AUTHORIZATION FROM ANY OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX TO DO SO!!!!!! ! Now I need to address XXXX XXXX XXXX, Marcadis Singer PA a debt Collector and the debt collection firm .Who is your Client XXXX XXXX XXXX / Marcadis Singer PA????? Who gave you consent and or authorization to have my CONSUMERS XXXX XXXX nonpublic information that you obtained by aggravated Identity thief in accordance to 18 USC 1028 ( a )??? I know for a fact that that consent never came from XXXX XXXX!!!! Who gave you XXXX XXXX XXXX, Marcadis Singer PA express consent to file a frivolous Lawsuit Against THE CONSUMER XXXX XXXX IN SEVENTEETH JUDICAL CIRCUIT COURT FOR XXXX COUNTY FLORIDA????? Is your client XXXX REGISTERED XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX located at XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, FL XXXX or your client is XXXX XXXX of XXXX in XXXX XXXX ( See Attachment Label XXXX XXXX )?? If that is the case then that goes to prove as evidence that you ( XXXX XXXX XXXX, Marcadis Singer PA, and Marcadis Singer Law firm ) engaged in extortion, racketeering activity, conspiracy, and extortionate means of an extension of credit 18 USC 894 .As well as XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. IN WHICH STILL MAKES XXXX XXXX XXXX CRIMINALLY AND CIVALLY LIABLE!!!!!
I NOW DEMAND YOU XXXX XXXX XXXX and Marcadis Singer PA ONCE AGAIN TO CEASE AND DESIST ALL COMMUNICATION WITH XXXX XXXX AND IMMEDIATELY DISMISS Case No. : XXXX AND Case No. : XXXX WITH PREJUDICE!!!!!! I NEVER, CONSENTED, ACCEPTED, UNDERSTOOD TO Case No. : XXXX AND Case No. : XXXX PROCEEDINGS!!!!!!
FUTHERMORE, I NEVER CONSENTED ACCEPTED, AUTHORIZED, AND CONFERED FOR YOU TO HAVE A MTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT HEARING FOR CASE NO. : XXXX ON XXXX, XXXX 2023 .YOU ARE NOT SLICK XXXX XXXX XXXXYou quickly hurried and deceptively scheduled that hearing 2 hours after the CFPB feedback complaint filed Against you on XXXX behind XXXX XXXX Back and against XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX to cease and desisit futher court proceeding for both cases!! ! XXXX XXXX AND OR XXXX XXXX WILL NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE XXXX, XXXX HEARING ( see attachment labeled Exhibit C filed into Case No. : XXXX AND XXXX XXXX. : XXXX on XXXX prior to hearing Date )!!!!!!!!!
AND BE ADVISED XXXX XXXX XXXX THAT FILING LAWSUIT AND OR PLEADINGS EVEN RECEIVING CORESPONDANCE FROM ANY THIRD PARTIES THAT WAS HIRED BY YOU CONSTITUTES HARRASEMENT!!!!! WRITTEN COMMUNICATION FROM YOU ( XXXX XXXX XXXX AND MARCADIS SINGER PA ) IS HARASSMENT!!!!!!!!! PLEASE XXXX XXXX XXXX AND MARCADIS SINGER PA GET ALL YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT AND IN ORDER. CORRECT I NEVER SPOKE TO YOU AND I NEVER DEMANDED TO SPEAK TO YOU. XXXX XXXX XXXX AND MARCADIS SINGER PA HAVE BEEN AGGRESSIVATLY EXTORTING, ABUSING. OPPRESSING AND HARRASSING XXXX XXXX FOR THE PAST YEAR OVER ALLEGED DEBT THAT IS NOT OWED. LEAVE XXXX XXXX AND I ONCE AGAIN REPEAT LEAVE XXXX XXXX ALONE!!!!!!!!
XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) : We will rejoice in your salvation, And in the name of our God we will set up our banners! May the Lord fulfill all your petitions.
|
| 12/15/2021 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
- Sued you without properly notifying you of lawsuit
|
|
Web |
|
|
XX/XX/2021 : I was served with a XXXX Summons/Notice to Appear for Pretrial Conference ( COVID ) by Marcadis/Singer. The Notice stated : " You are hereby notified that you are required to appear on the XXXX day of XXXX. 2021 at 2pm for a Pretrial Conference. " PLEASE GO TO XXXX [ XXXX ] TO CHECK THE INDIVIDUAL JUDGE 'S SITE FOR INSTRUCTIONS DUE TO COVID-19 '' The Notice to Appear nor any of the documents I was served with gave any instruction on how to appear for the Pretrial Conference. I went to the link, and realized I needed to Marcadis/Singer PA to get more information. I was only able to speak with a representative from their " Collections Dept '' and she instructed me to contact the courthouse to find out how to appear for the online pretrial conference. I was confused that the attorney 's office would not and could not give me information on how to appear at the hearing.
I then contact the Court to find out exactly how to attend this online hearing. I was told to find the " meeting room '' for Division H. I checked, and double checked the meeting room online weeks prior to the pretrial hearing in order to be prepared the day of the hearing.
XXXX XXXX, 2021 : I called Marcadis/Singer PA the day before the hearing to make sure the hearing was still being held. Again, I was only able to speak to a representative in their " Collections Dept '' and she told me that the hearing was still scheduled as per the summons.
XXXX XXXX, 2021 : I logged into the online hearing link 30 minutes before the 2pm hearing time so that I would early. I waited until 3pm and no one showed up. I tried logging in to different divisions to see if I might be in the wrong place, but no one was online at all. I called Marcadis/Singer PA twice during the supposed hearing to ask them where the attorney 's were and they told me " i will have someone call you back. '' No one ever called me back.
XXXX XXXX, 2021 : I tried reaching an alternative department at Marcadis/Singer PA because I still had not heard back. I left voicemail. I did not receive a call back.
End of XX/XX/2021 : I received a Default Final Judgement from Marcadis/Singer PA claiming " The Defendant failing to appear for the Pretrial Conference on XXXX, 2021 and the Plaintiff filing the appropriate pleadings in this matter ... '' After reading this, I attempted to contact Marcadis/Singer PA one last time. I left voicemail and again, did not receive a call back.
Marcadis/Singer PA has set up an unworkable situation in two important ways : - The pretrial conference information was unclear confusing and had no clear directions on how to attend. Once I was in attendance and realized no one was there, their office was not helpful in getting me the information I needed to successfully attend the conference.
- It is impossible to be in communication with anyone at their law firm, thereby no solution can be met that is fair to both parties.
It is my belief that they purposefully and willfully set up an unworkable situation so that defendants are forced into a Default Final Judgement.
|
| 09/02/2022 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Other debt
|
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
- Sued you without properly notifying you of lawsuit
|
|
Web |
|
|
This dispute is concerning the dental supplier XXXX XXXX. I bought a used XXXX autoclave from their company in XXXX for my business. I paid a total of {$4200.00} for this serial number. Unbeknownst to me, I also was double billed for the same type of autoclave, an XXXX, under a different serial number and agreement # for a total of {$2100.00}. I did not find this out until a few weeks ago, in XX/XX/XXXX after consultation with my attorney.
The reason I found out XXXX XXXX double billed me, is because XXXX XXXX has brought forth a legal complaint against me for the same agreement # that I already paid off a few years ago. I was just served papers for small claims court for {$6400.00}, which is almost the same amount that I paid off a few years ago. I called the billing department at XXXX XXXX, and the collections attorneys that are trying to sue me for this amount, that I already paid this off. They advised me that they know I paid off the previous amount, but that this new complaint is for something different. I advised them that it was not, and that it is the same agreement # as before.
I would also like to note that it appears that XXXX XXXX backdated an invoice to XX/XX/XXXX with no serial number. It just states that I owe {$6400.00} for a large equipment rental fee for XXXX week. This also makes no sense, because I have never been billed by their company nor sent any invoices for this. I never signed any contracts or rented or bought any large equipment from them since XXXX. In other words, they are waiting until XXXX to bill me for an erroneous rental XXXX years ago because the statute of limitations is running out, and they never properly recorded me paying for the equipment before.
I did consult with an attorney concerning this matter, and they are the ones who found out that I was double billed for the equipment, and that they waited 4 years to produce an erroneous invoice because the statute of limitations is running out.
This lawsuit has caused me to lose work time and has cost me lawyers fees. I have also been served legal papers, been double-billed, and have had to deal with illegal backdating of invoices all for a large company to make money from a small business owner.
I would like to get the amount back that I was over-billed plus interest, and my attorneys fees paid.
Thank You
|
| 05/28/2019 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- Written notification about debt
- Didn't receive enough information to verify debt
|
|
Web |
|
|
XXXX XXXX, XXXX ( a bill collector ), Marcadis Singer Law Firm, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Florida XXXX, has served me with an order for Deposition and Order to Show Cause because he would like for me to show all of my assets and/or income for the 36 months preceding the service of the notice. The notice is dated XX/XX/XXXX. The records being requested are as follows : bank statements and cancelled checks, all of my savings account deposit books, copies of my state tax returns, books of records and all memoranda reflecting my assets and/or income. Deeds to realty, bills of sale for personalty, and title certificates to motor vehicles. The Plaintiff listed on the order is : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, as assignee of XXXX. I have informed this bill collector repeatedly that I need legal representation and can not afford it. I did not hear from them for 8 years, I thought it was all over and I started receiving the letters again. I appeared in court about 10 years for this same matter. Is there a statute of limitations on this? I don't understand how they can continue to try to get money from me for a very old bill that is no longer on my credit report. I am a lay person without money to hire an attorney. I feel intimidated that a bill collector is asking me to provide this information. I need help in the matter. I don't know what my rights are or what to do. Please help me. I'm scheduled for a court appearance on XX/XX/XXXX, if I do not go to the deposition and provide the information requested. I would appreciate any help that you can give me in this matter. Thank you. XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX . XXXX, XXXX, FL XXXX
|
| 03/13/2023 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- False statements or representation
- Attempted to collect wrong amount
|
|
Web |
|
|
I received a letter from Marcadis SInger, PA Attorneys at Law claiming that I owe a debt for XXXX XXXX XXXX. This my first time having this communication from this attorney office. Ive already sent off a validation to XXXX XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/2022 about this alleged debt. I havent heard from XXXX XXXX XXXX nor Marcadis Singer, PA until now. The certified letter with tracking # XXXX to XXXX XXXX XXXX and it was delivered XX/XX/2022 at XXXX. Ive also sent a validation of debt to Marcadis Singer, PA attorney at law about this same debt ( tracking # XXXX ). Which is now in transit to the attorney office. It been almost a year from the first time communication from XXXX XXXX XXXX. Additionally, I am allowed 30 days to dispute the validity of the debt. If you are unable to provide me with proper proof, then you must stop attempting to collect this alleged debt.
If you continue to claim I owe a debt that you can not confirm with proof then you will be in direct violation of the FDCPA 15 USC 1692g. Additionally, any attempt on your part to report this alleged debt to my credit reports will be a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
|
| 12/31/2022 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- False statements or representation
- Impersonated attorney, law enforcement, or government official
|
|
Web |
|
|
Marcadis Singer PA is in violation of my federally protected consumer rights according to 15 usc 1692e ( 3 ) a debt collector, in collecting a debt, ( Which Marcadis Singer PA is trying to collect an alleged debt ) may not use any false, deceptive or misleading represent or imply that he or she is an attorney or that communication is from an attorney.
Further, as per judgement made in the case of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, the provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act applies to attorneys who " regularly '' engage in consumer- debt collection activity, even when that activity consists of litigation. Thereof, as per judgement mentioned herein, your firm is liable as a debt collector.
|
| 10/21/2023 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- I do not know
|
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
- Collected or attempted to collect exempt funds
|
|
Web |
|
|
On XX/XX/2020 funds were garnished out of my bank accounts totaling {$1500.00}. The bank also imposed a {$120.00} legal fee. The funds that were garnished were unemployment funds that I transferred from my checking into my savings account which I have attached. I have also attached supporting documents showing that I was receiving unemployment from XXXX. I also have supporting documents showing I filed an exemption with the clerk of courts. I also never received any prior correspondence from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX prior to garnishment.
|
| 06/21/2021 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- I do not know
|
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
- Sued you without properly notifying you of lawsuit
|
|
Web |
|
|
I sent a certified letter to Marcadis Singer Law Firm on XX/XX/2021. The letter included a notarized Affidavit of Truth including Exhibits A, and B., and a Cease & Desist Letter as well a an invoice for violation of my Federally Protected Consumer Rights under 15 USC 1692 in the amount of {$3000.00}. The Law firm is in violation of the following : *15 USC 1692g ( c ) *15 USC 1692g ( d ) *15 USC 1692i ( b )
|
| 03/31/2022 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Other debt
|
- False statements or representation
- Attempted to collect wrong amount
|
|
Web |
|
|
Marcadis Singer, PA in XXXX, FL is trying to sue me for {$35000.00} for a debt I don't owe. I have no connection to the complaint and are alleging fake and false statements. This company is harassing me.
|
| 12/20/2023 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- Attempts to collect debt not owed
- Debt is not yours
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 07/08/2023 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
- Collected or attempted to collect exempt funds
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 05/03/2023 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
- Seized or attempted to seize your property
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 01/28/2022 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- I do not know
|
- False statements or representation
- Attempted to collect wrong amount
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 06/17/2021 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Auto debt
|
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
- Seized or attempted to seize your property
|
|
Phone |
|
|
|
| 02/15/2019 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Mortgage debt
|
- Attempts to collect debt not owed
- Debt is not yours
|
|
Postal mail |
|
|
|