| 10/31/2015 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Sued w/o proper notification of suit
|
|
Web |
|
|
XXXX XXXX XXXX is the attorney representing XXXX XXXX, who has sued XXXX XXXX over debt collection. The suit was filed in XX/XX/XXXX. XXXX was not aware that the suit had escalated to the point of a bank levy, which was withdrawn from XXXX 's bank account out XX/XX/XXXX without prior notification. The levy included the amount owed, interest, attorney fees, and court fees. The total amount being sued is almost double the amount owed.
Since the withdrawal of the levy in XX/XX/XXXX, XXXX has been attempting to contact XXXX with the assistance of his daughter, XXXX XXXX, in the hopes of resolving the case.
XXXX can not be reached directly through the number provided. Representatives of his firm answers the phone and the representative explicitly states that they can not provide a number to which he can directly be reached. Representative does not state what position they hold in the firm. When XXXX requested to speak to an attorney directly or for direct phone number, representative stated they can not put in such request giving the reason that the attorneys are either very busy or are out of the office on business. Since XXXX was not initially aware of what the case was about or even how the levied came about, request for more case information and documents was denied by representative. The representative told XXXX the only way to access court documents was to request it from directly from the court. When XXXX asked for any options for the levy to be returned to the bank account, representative denied any other option other than paying them in full for the sued amount. Representative did not make it known that a claim of exemption was available. Recordings of phone conversations with representatives are recorded by the firm.
XXXX was able to get court documents directly from the court. After examining the documents, it can be noted that the proof of debt did not include list of transactions that was not paid. The proof consisted of a bill that already had the accumulated amount with past due dates. After doing some research, XXXX found that a claim of exemption may be filed for a return of the levy and was filed shortly thereafter.
On the day of the hearing to determine the claim of exemption, XXXX was not present. After the judge heard each side, judge approved for a partial return of the levy. XXXX stated that other potential resolution in regards to the case could be made by communicating to the other party outside the courtroom. After greeting the other party outside, the other party stated she was a representing lawyer that the firm occasionally hired. The representing lawyer also stated since she is not the attorney assigned to the case, she could not answer any questions that XXXX XXXX had. After leaving the courthouse, XXXX made a call to the firm to see how else to resolve the case. The representative stated since they have not received any information from the court, they could not answer any questions. When requesting to have firm call XXXX back once they receive court information, they rejected request stating that the firm is too busy to make any call backs.
|
| 04/18/2015 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Sued w/o proper notification of suit
|
|
Web |
|
|
On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX a judgment for {$8100.00} was taken against me without my knowledge. The debt buyers had won by default. On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, my neighbors received a letter addressed with my name and their address, containing a 'subpoena deposition for bank records ' and XXXX for 'production of business records ' addressed to our bankI was never informed because they never delivered a supoena.
I went to the courthouse and asked to see my file,. When I saw the process servers paper I knew why. This hearing was supposed to be defaulted, and if my neighbors would n't have given me the mail with their address, a year after the hearing, I would n't have gotten thus far.
I went to file to vacate the order and a to quash the 'subpoena duces tecum ' and was denied. I tried to explain to the judge that I never received a subpoena and the process server lied because the description on his paperwork did not describe me, and in fact it was the opposite description of me.
I could not vacate the order, they lied about everything, sued me on a time barred debt for {$8100.00}, and proceeded to place it on my credit report, as though I opened the account with them. This is when my neighbors address was put on my credit report as mine, and stipulated it was to stay until XXXX. This year his business address showed on my credit report also. I have had their home address removed this week, now I will work on the business address being removed also.
While investigating all this I believe that my credit report is how they found out what bank to go to, and making it appear that I owed them a debt and they were the creditors. But by not informing me of the hearing and winning by default, messing with my credit report, I have stressed enough from all this just to have my motions denied.
I also looked into the hearings they have going on in their home town, XXXX XXXX, there were literally XXXX of people being sued, are any of them receiving their supoenas? or will they win again by default.?
|
| 08/20/2016 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Attempted to/Collected exempt funds
|
|
Web |
|
|
Dear CFPB, this company LEGAL RECOVERY LAW OFFICE, has seized all the money in our bank account total {$2100.00} plus fees total {$2200.00} on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, leaving us with no money to pay our modified mortgage or utilities or groceries.
The bank is holding the funds until XXXX/XXXX/XXXX before releasing it. Attached is bank notice to us.
In XXXX XXXX when the real estate market crashed in XXXX XXXX California , my wife and I both lost our jobs. We use all our reserves to make our mortgage and credit cards payments but few months later we were broke. I was XXXX at the time and due to health issues I was not able to continue with that business. I had used my XXXX XXXX credit card during my XXXX for expenses but with the lost of my business, I was not able to make payments. My wife and I started with sales but that took us some time to get back on our feet. Our new jobs could not cover our credit cards payments and eventually, we were default on all credit cards and even mortgage payments. Now we are able to pay our modification mortgage and utility bills. We are just not able to make credit cards payments ; my wife and I are barely making enough to get by in this economy.
After we became default with my credit cards in XXXX. XXXX XXXX sold the debt to LEGAL RECOVERY LAW OFFICES INC in XXXX of XXXX ; They filed a lawsuit and got a judgment on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX for XXXX. Since then they have aggressively taken money from our bank accounts various times leaving us without money to pay my modification mortgage or utility bills or groceries. They have continuously caused us tremendous XXXX. On the XXXX of XXXX XXXX, they have taken {$2200.00} from our account ( this is my mortgage payment ). Now we are devastated. Please help us.
|
| 04/05/2016 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Sued w/o proper notification of suit
|
|
Web |
|
|
After receiving an uncertified letter in the mail from Legal Recovery Law Offices , Inc. stating that they would be suing for an old debt on behalf of XXXX XXXX XXXX ; My employer received documents for a wage garnishment. I then made contact with Legal Recovery Law Offices Inc. to reach an agreement on a payment plan. They accepted and a " good faith '' payment was made that day ( XXXX XXXX, 2015 ) in the amount of {$240.00} via my debt card. Following this payment I was sent documents for the payment plan that was agreed to. It was a three year plan with payments of {$240.00} per month. I was to fill in the date for each automatic payment to be withdrawn from my account. They printed my entire debt card number and cvc number on this document. Once I filled in the dates and signed it, I sent it back to their address at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX # XXXX XXXX XXXX, CA XXXX. A few months later I realized that a payment had not been taken out. At this point my wife called to verify what was going on as our entire bank account information was on this document. They claimed they never received it. Several times after this I tried to fax them the information and not once did the fax go through. Last week I made phone contact with them again to resolve the issue and was informed on recorded phone call that the fax number had been out of order for over a year. This is the number still listed on documents sent by the company. At this time they informed me that since payment had not ben received, they were taking action again via wage garnishment. Over the last week my wife and I have made every effort to find a solution with this company and have had no success.
|
| 04/08/2015 |
No |
|
|
|
Web |
|
|
I am a permanently XXXX XXXX year old man. XXXX. I have been in and out of hospitals for 8 years, XXXX lost my house, and lived in a friend 's garage. I have survived on my $ 1800/mos XXXX ( which I am trying work my way off of ). I am trying to correct/negotiate items on my credit report. I have had good success at settling most accounts. However, Legal Recovery Offices ( LRO ) at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, CA has been unscrupulous and told me tough luck. I had originally contacted XXXX XXXX ( account number ******************* ) credit card. I contacted XXXX XXXX and spoke to XXXX at XXXX ( ext XXXX ) who advised I ask LRO to return the account to XXXX XXXX. LRO said no. They garnished my government benefit account funds. I filed a claim of exemption which was granted ( XXXX Court of California case number XXXX ). During that process XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX advised me that the proof of service represented to the court when the granted a judgement was returned. I was not served and had no chance to defend myself. XXXX I am trying to correct my credit, which was always high. The cruel words from LRO attorney XXXX XXXX that he " did n't care '' were shocking and inhumane. I seek the same treatment from LRO as the other creditors I 've been working with. They refuse to discuss a payment plan and, as XXXX XXXX said, expect to collect every penny of my original debt plus the near XXXX fees and interest they have added on. He hung up on me. I did n't choose to get so sick and lost everything, house, savings, etc. Please advise me how to deal with this cruel unscrupulous company. Thanks for your valuable time.
|
| 06/10/2018 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- Attempts to collect debt not owed
- Debt was already discharged in bankruptcy and is no longer owed
|
|
Web |
|
|
I recently checked my credit report and discovered I had an Abstract of Judgement issued on XX/XX/XXXX filed by Attorney XXXX XXXX XXXX of Legal Recovery Law Offices , Inc. Filed in Superior court of XXXX XXXX county XXXX courthouse ( case # XXXX ). The plaintiff is listed as XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) and I am listed as the defendant. The judgement was in the amount of {$4800.00} entered on XX/XX/XXXX.
I had filed chapter XXXX bankruptcy XX/XX/XXXX. A notice of this filing was sent to both XXXX XXXX bankruptcy dept. and to Legal Recovery Law offices. The bankruptcy was discharged XX/XX/XXXX. The attorney ( XXXX XXXX ) filed this lien as being a secured debt therefore getting around the bankruptcy. This is an unethical filing which should have never been done. It was an unsecured credit card debt in which his business ( Legal Recovery Law Offices , Inc. ) was notified and listed as one of the debtors that had been notified of the chapter XXXX bankruptcy.
According to my bankruptcy attorney this judgement should have never been filed due to the circumstances. I was also made aware that the attorney who filed this lienmotion had been sanctioned by the state bar several times around the time of this action for doing similar acts.
I am requesting that this judgement against me be removed since it was done illegally.
|
| 08/20/2015 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
- Debt was paid
|
|
Web |
Servicemember |
|
Regarding practices of Attorney XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX # XXXX. XXXX collected numerous debts on behalf of XXXX XXXX credit card against XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX is on social security and had only the social security payments as assets in her account. He garnished ( against government rulings ) her account in excess of {$3000.00} leaving her destitute, and at the same time put a hold on her safety deposit box. Upon being contacted by the FTC, the bank quickly reimbursed her the funds, but this was wall after she had to borrow money to make up her monthly stipend. Attorney XXXX stated in his answer to FTC that he would remove the hold on the safety deposit box. This has not been done to date and he is holding not only her belongings, but those of her daughter and grandson. He needs to follow up on his word and take the hold off of the safety deposit box immediately. He is an unethical attorney who preys on the most vulnerable and he should be sanctioned for his tactics. His company is called Legal Recovery XXXX and is located in XXXX XXXX. After a year has passed with nothing done to release the safety deposit box, I am refiling this complaint.
|
| 07/21/2015 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Threatened to sue on too old debt
|
|
Web |
|
|
In XXXX Legal Recovery Law Offices XXXX Inc., in XXXX XXXX, CA, who was representing XXXX, filed a lawsuit against me for a debt for a credit card I had originally with XXXX. Since I was unaware of XXXX right to collect on this account, I requested validation of the debt. However, I received no response even after filing my answer to the court and even through the " discovery '' phase. Now, three years later on XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Legal Recovery Law Offices is now representing the buyer of this debt, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, and has filed a " Memorandum for Trial Setting '' on this debt, which is now time barred according to last-payment information on my credit report. According to my credit report, the last payment I made on my XXXX account was XXXX XXXX, five and a half years ago. My understanding is that according to California law, debt collectors can not sue for a debt that exceeds the statute of limitations or is " time barred. '' I am writing a letter to the XXXX XXXX XXXX Court asking the judge to dismiss the complaint due to the failure of the plaintiff to validate the claim and the fact that the statute of limitations has passed.
|
| 07/10/2016 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
- Debt is not mine
|
|
Web |
Older American |
|
Daughter was placed as POA for my Father from XXXX. During this time, debt was accrued in my Father 's name by use of his SSN. He was hospitalized during times that funds were misappropriated. Father and I ( son, his current POA ) have already had to go to court with this law office over another debt committed by the Daughter in question. Collection law office employs attorneys who have been disbarred multiple times as well as those who send letters claiming that my father has made requests to obtain balance. All false, concerned, I called in to verify that this was fraud similar to what took place last year. Debt collector was rude, misinformed and disclosed vital information about my father without my or his permission only to let me know we are not being sued. When told we were not being sued, then 'why the harassment ', I asked. To which they responded, unless i have an attorney they recommend we end the call as we have reached an endpass.
|
| 02/24/2016 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Sued w/o proper notification of suit
|
|
Web |
Older American |
|
XXXX XXXX XXXX is the attorney representing XXXX XXXX, who has sued XXXX XXXX.over debt collection.The suit was filed XX/XX/XXXX.XXXX was not aware that the suit has escalated to the point of a bank levy, which was withdrawn from XXXX 's bank account out in XXXX 2015 without prior notification.the levy included the amount owed, interest, attorney & court fee, the total amount being sued is almost double the amount owed. Since the withdrawal of the levy in XXXX 2015, XXXX has attempting to contact XXXX with the assistance of my daughter, XXXX XXXX, in the hopes of resolving the case. XXXX ca n't reached directly through the number provided.Representative of his firm answers the phone and the representative explicitly states that they ca n't provide a number to which he can directly be reached.They ca n't put in such request giving the reason that XXXX are very busy or out the office.
|
| 09/01/2015 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- False statements or representation
- Attempted to collect wrong amount
|
|
Web |
|
|
On XX/XX/XXXX, I was contacted by XXXX XXXX from Legal Recovery Law Office, located in XXXX XXXX, CA. He stated that he was attempting to collect on a judgment in the amount of XXXX. This is the amount that they reported to the credit bureau. He stated the judgment was for XXXX, however, per the court records ( I verified on XX/XX/XXXX ), the judgment was for XXXX, which included the full debt amount, punitive damages of XXXX and attorney 's fees of XXXX. He stated that they added their judgment filing fees and court costs and fees and that the last time it increased was in XX/XX/XXXX, raising the amount to XXXX I believe that he has violated the FDCPA by misrepresenting the amount of the judgment, and the amount owed, and also by sending false information to the credit bureau.
I am deeply concerned that they will continue to add fees once the debt is negotiated and/or settled.
|
| 07/02/2018 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- False statements or representation
- Impersonated attorney, law enforcement, or government official
|
|
Web |
Older American, Servicemember |
|
Received a call on XX/XX/XXXX will include.
Called number they had last 4 numbers of social security number.
Someone name XXXX told me I owe around {$2000.00} plus for credit card XXXX XXXX XXXX.
If did not pay now. I will be charged a court cost that would make around {$4300.00}.
I did let him know that I could not recall the card He told me I open it in XX/XX/XXXXand XX/XX/XXXX it when it went bad. XX/XX/XXXXtill now just getting informed. No written letter!
After getting my brain to work - I called again Same person told me that I open account in XX/XX/XXXX- went bad in XX/XX/XXXX this time.
Told him needed to ask 2 questions date of last activity & when did they received this information. He refused to answer.
If this debt is minds it would be time barred California credit card 4 years )
|
| 01/20/2019 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- False statements or representation
- Attempted to collect wrong amount
|
|
Web |
|
|
Hi.Legal recovery law office representing XXXX XXXX got a default judgment on a credit card debt in XX/XX/XXXX. They had a XXXX XXXX and started wage garnishment immediately. On XX/XX/XXXX I received a letter from XXXX XXXX of XXXX and XXXX. stating that that they are now representing XXXX XXXX with still a balance of {$9700.00} and the last payment they received was in XX/XX/XXXX. ( Wage garnishment started in XX/XX/XXXX and is still ongoing ). I have on numerous occation asked for a payment history but they keep sending the original Judgment. I believe either the judgment has been paid or being closed to being paid off. I would like The XXXX XXXX of XXXX and XXXX to provide some clarity on this judgment and a payment history please. Thank you.
|
| 06/10/2015 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- I do not know
|
- False statements or representation
- Attempted to collect wrong amount
|
|
Web |
|
|
I received a Garnishment Doc from the XXXX County Superior Court via XXXX County Sheriffs department through my Employer XXXX. It was from Legal Recovery Law Offices for the plaintiff XXXX XXXX XXXX. It 's states that I owe {$4000.00} to XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX is a debt purchaser, from what I read online. XXXX through XXXX XXXX XXXX Offices have however, ALREADY started collecting in the amount of {$70.00} witch will be 25 % a week of my check, being so that I am a temp employee. This is CLEARLY a violation of the Fair Debt Act, as XXXX nor Legal Recovery Law Offices STATE the ORIGINAL creditor on this Garnishment Doc? There is n't even a TYPE of credit that this {$4000.00} was for?
|
| 05/31/2016 |
Yes |
|
|
|
Web |
|
|
XXXX XXXX, 2016 - I received a letter from XXXX XXXX, Legal Recovery Law Offices , Inc saying the Plaintiff : XXXX XXXX XXXX vs Defendant - XXXX. It list no details except that there is a Declaration of Accrued Interest. Interest on the judgement accruing at the legal rate from the date of entry on balances due after partial satisfaction and other credits in the amount of {$940.00}.
I called the Law Office to know what they are talking about but the was asking for social security and other personal information that I did not want to give. I was wiling to give the case number which is XXXX but the receptionist hung up. I feel that I am being harrassed by this law office and XXXX.
|
| 07/12/2016 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Disclosure verification of debt
- Not given enough info to verify debt
|
|
Web |
|
|
i submitted a complaint and my Case number : XXXX. Today I received another letter from Legal Recovery law Offices and this time the plaintiff is XXXX XXXX XXXX , XXXX.
I called the Law office again to verify what debt they are talking but the receptionist was saying I owe over {$10000.00} and she is not allowed to discuss over the phone than hung up on me. I have been harassed by the Legal Recovery Law offices numerous times.
I just want it to stop.
|
| 04/01/2015 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Sued where didn't live/sign for debt
|
|
Web |
|
|
I am requesting validation of debt against this so call LAW FIRM XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX " Legal Recovery Law '' I am very well aware of my rights and wont hesitate making a complaint against LAW FIRM with the FTC if they dont specifically validate the debt with all requested bullet points in what I expect from them to do step by step. PLEASE FOLLOW ALL LEGAL PROCEDURES TO PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION REQUESTED
|
| 11/25/2019 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- Written notification about debt
- Didn't receive notice of right to dispute
|
|
Web |
Servicemember |
|
|
| 11/12/2018 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Other debt
|
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
- Seized or attempted to seize your property
|
|
Web |
Servicemember |
|
|
| 03/05/2018 |
No |
- Debt collection
- I do not know
|
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
- Threatened to sue you for very old debt
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 03/07/2017 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Communication tactics
- Threatened to take legal action
|
|
Postal mail |
|
|
|
| 08/14/2016 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Disclosure verification of debt
- Not given enough info to verify debt
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 08/01/2016 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Disclosure verification of debt
- Right to dispute notice not received
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 01/29/2016 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Threatened to sue on too old debt
|
|
Web |
Older American |
|
|
| 01/06/2016 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- False statements or representation
- Attempted to collect wrong amount
|
|
Web |
Servicemember |
|
|
| 06/11/2015 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Other (i.e. phone, health club, etc.)
|
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
- Debt was paid
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 05/26/2015 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
- Debt was paid
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 03/31/2015 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Disclosure verification of debt
- Right to dispute notice not received
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 03/18/2015 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
- Debt is not mine
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 03/05/2015 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
- Debt resulted from identity theft
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 01/15/2015 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Disclosure verification of debt
- Right to dispute notice not received
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 12/28/2014 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Seized/Attempted to seize property
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 10/16/2014 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
- Debt was paid
|
|
Web |
Older American |
|
|
| 10/09/2014 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Seized/Attempted to seize property
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 10/03/2014 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Seized/Attempted to seize property
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 06/14/2014 |
No |
|
- False statements or representation
- Attempted to collect wrong amount
|
|
Web |
Older American |
|
|
| 05/20/2014 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- I do not know
|
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
- Debt is not mine
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 04/21/2014 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Communication tactics
- Threatened to take legal action
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 04/16/2014 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- False statements or representation
- Attempted to collect wrong amount
|
|
Web |
Older American |
|
|
| 04/11/2014 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- I do not know
|
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
- Debt was paid
|
|
Referral |
|
|
|
| 03/27/2014 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Sued w/o proper notification of suit
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 03/12/2014 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
- Debt was paid
|
|
Web |
Servicemember |
|
|
| 03/04/2014 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
- Debt was paid
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 02/27/2014 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Disclosure verification of debt
- Not given enough info to verify debt
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 02/27/2014 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- I do not know
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Sued where didn't live/sign for debt
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 10/09/2013 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Disclosure verification of debt
- Not given enough info to verify debt
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 09/12/2013 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Threatened to sue on too old debt
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 09/06/2013 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card
|
- Disclosure verification of debt
- Right to dispute notice not received
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 09/05/2013 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Other (i.e. phone, health club, etc.)
|
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
- Debt was discharged in bankruptcy
|
|
Web |
Servicemember |
|
|