Landmark Strategy Group, LLC CFPB Complaints

Back to Dashboard
2000 Latest Complaints
Date Received Timely Response Product Issue State / Zip Submitted Via Tags
05/23/2023 Yes
  • Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
  • Credit reporting
  • Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
  • Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
  • FL
  • 33147
Web
Im following up on a complaint against XXXX XXXX and Landmark Strategy Group for practices that I believe violate the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ). According to my agreement with XXXX XXXX, all disputes related to my account were to be resolved through arbitration. However, without my consent or any arbitration proceedings, XXXX XXXX sold my loan to a collection agency, Landmark Strategy Group. In their response they admitted they don't own the debt that it was owned by a collection agency. I believe this act constitutes a breach of contract and violates my rights as a consumer. When I became aware of this issue, I contacted XXXX XXXX and expressed my willingness to repay the debt directly to them. Despite my willingness to settle the debt, XXXX XXXX refused to recall the debt that I believe was sold illegally. Furthermore, in the course of this transaction, XXXX XXXX disclosed my personal information to Landmark Strategy Group without my consent. I believe this is a violation of FCRA Section 604 ( a ) ( 3 ) ( F ), which restricts the dissemination of consumer information without a legitimate business need. Following the acquisition of my loan, Landmark Strategy Group has engaged in harassment in an attempt to collect the alleged debt. They have called me multiple times during work hours and even contacted my workplace directly. They have also threatened to report the debt to credit reporting agencies if I didn't pay them. In order to avoid further harassment and potential harm to my credit report, I felt forced to pay Landmark Strategy Group. I believe these actions constitute violations of FDCPA Section 806 ( 5 ), which prohibits causing a telephone to ring or engaging any person in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number ; FDCPA Section 805 ( a ) ( 1 ), which prohibits communication with a consumer in connection with the collection of any debt at the consumer 's place of employment ; and FDCPA Section 807 ( 5 ), which prohibits the threat to take any action that can not legally be taken or that is not intended to be taken. In light of these concerns, I request that the CFPB investigate these issues and take appropriate action to protect my rights as a consumer. I also ask that XXXX XXXX remove this account from my credit report immediately, as I believe it was wrongly sold and reported to the collection agency.
09/21/2023 Yes
  • Debt collection
  • Payday loan debt
  • False statements or representation
  • Attempted to collect wrong amount
  • MS
  • 39443
Web
Obtain loan from XXXX XXXX in XXXX. Loan was not paid off. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX aquired loan written off by Balance. I made several payments to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX but then they told me different stories on what would be acceptable to repay. Landmark Strategy XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX acquired written off debt from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. I received a phone call on XX/XX/XXXX from a representative at XXXX XXXX XXXX. They were seeking the full balance of over {$4000.00} I owed XXXX that has been written off by XXXX I informed the representative I would pay XXXX the amount they paid when the bought the debt plus 10 percent for a profit. They would not accept that. I then asked the representative if I paid the full balance, who would receive that money. The representative told me XXXX would receive the funds. That is an absolute and total lie. Its deceptive and not allowed under Federal Law. They have now are susceptible to being fined for providing false and misleading information. If the Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction over this matter then it should be turned over to them for corrective action.