| 08/01/2022 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Mortgage debt
|
- False statements or representation
- Attempted to collect wrong amount
|
|
Web |
Older American, Servicemember |
|
In violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Attorney XXXX XXXX XXXX, Johnson, Blumberg Associates, LLC filed the attached Notice of Sheriff Sale XX/XX/2022, and caused the same to be served on my wife and I, who hold a deed to the property with stating the Judgment to be satisfied, in violation of the FDCPA. Upon receiving notice of the sheriff 's sale, I immediately contacted Johnson, Blumberg Associates, LLC and spoke to an employee that identified herself as : XXXX. I explained the Notice of Sheriff Sale did not list the Judgment to be satisfied. She stated she would have that amount emailed to me that day or at the latest the next day, XXXX XX/XX/2022. It was never emailed. This violates the FDCPA. Further, for years the mortgage holder servicer ; XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX ; and the mortgage holder : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, AS TRUSTEEE FOR CERTIFICATEHOLDERS XXXX XXXX, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATE, SERIES XXXX, has repeatedly failed to comply with federal after we have received written authorization from their client and he also gave verbal authorization to the servicer who gave us a quit claim deed to stand in his shoes to pay off his mortgage so we can clear the stain on the title. 15 U.S. Code 1639g, states : - Requests for payoff amounts of home loan. A creditor or servicer of a home loan shall send an accurate payoff balance within a reasonable time, but in no case more than 7 business days, after the receipt of a written request for such balance from or on behalf of the borrower. In fact the attorneys for the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and its servicer, XXXX, Attorney XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX and Attorney XXXX XXXX, have mislead courts on a material factual matter, to wit : they in fact had the required authorization to provide a payoff letter, whether for use in an assumption or for the Plaintiff to get an outside loan, and made a material misstatement of fact that they could not provide a pay off letter. This violates federal law as shown above.
|
| 08/19/2022 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Mortgage debt
|
- False statements or representation
- Attempted to collect wrong amount
|
|
Web |
Older American, Servicemember |
|
In XXXX ( Attorney XXXX XXXX letter ) and XXXX ( Authorization ) we submitted two signed third party authorizations, from borrower XXXX XXXX twice and their own call records show XXXX XXXX called XXXX and the Bank XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX, requesting they provide me with a pay of borrower XXXX XXXX 's loan. They refused to do so but their attorney 's XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX lied to two court, XXXX to federal bankruptcy court that we could go across the street and get a mortgage, which I could not because they refused to give us a payoff, and XXXX XXXX stating a payoff could not be provided because he had to protect his client, XXXX XXXX 's privacy, when in fact XXXX was fully aware his client XXXX had two authorizations and neither his firm nor XXXX XXXX XXXX did not represent the new master servicer Bank XXXX XXXX. I spoke to Bank XXXX XXXX who advised me that both authorizations I submitted in XXXX ( Attorney XXXX XXXX letter ) and XXXX ( Authorization ) from borrower XXXX XXXX were sufficient for XXXX to have provided me a payoff letter. The new law firm in a letter dated XX/XX/XXXX, from XXXX XXXX XXXX, Managing Member Johnson , Blumberg & Associates , LLC Attorneys at Law, representing Bank XXXX XXXX responded to my complaint # XXXX, by falsely stating I had stated that I had never gotten a copy of the foreclosure judgment, which was a lie, as I had never stated that. Further he NEVER offered to provide me with a authorization for his client Bank XXXX XXXX, who in fact provided me their payoff authorization for borrower XXXX XXXX to sign earlier this week. This is a continuing violation of federal law and FDCPA.
|
| 10/18/2017 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Mortgage debt
|
- False statements or representation
- Attempted to collect wrong amount
|
|
Web |
|
|
XXXX from XXXX XXXX to complaint number XXXX was not satisfactory they need to supply proof as requested in my complaint number.
Summary judgment was not granted and there is a counter suit against XXXX XXXX for filing a fraudulent complaint.
They are lying through their teeth.
|
| 09/25/2017 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Mortgage debt
|
- False statements or representation
- Attempted to collect wrong amount
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 09/26/2016 |
Yes |
- Mortgage
- Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)
|
- Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
|
|
Phone |
|
|
|
| 12/19/2014 |
Yes |
- Mortgage
- Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)
|
- Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
|
|
Referral |
Older American |
|
|