Johnson, Blumberg & Associates, LLC CFPB Complaints

Back to Dashboard
2000 Latest Complaints
Date Received Timely Response Product Issue State / Zip Submitted Via Tags
08/01/2022 Yes
  • Debt collection
  • Mortgage debt
  • False statements or representation
  • Attempted to collect wrong amount
  • IN
  • 46628
Web Older American, Servicemember
In violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Attorney XXXX XXXX XXXX, Johnson, Blumberg Associates, LLC filed the attached Notice of Sheriff Sale XX/XX/2022, and caused the same to be served on my wife and I, who hold a deed to the property with stating the Judgment to be satisfied, in violation of the FDCPA. Upon receiving notice of the sheriff 's sale, I immediately contacted Johnson, Blumberg Associates, LLC and spoke to an employee that identified herself as : XXXX. I explained the Notice of Sheriff Sale did not list the Judgment to be satisfied. She stated she would have that amount emailed to me that day or at the latest the next day, XXXX XX/XX/2022. It was never emailed. This violates the FDCPA. Further, for years the mortgage holder servicer ; XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX ; and the mortgage holder : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, AS TRUSTEEE FOR CERTIFICATEHOLDERS XXXX XXXX, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATE, SERIES XXXX, has repeatedly failed to comply with federal after we have received written authorization from their client and he also gave verbal authorization to the servicer who gave us a quit claim deed to stand in his shoes to pay off his mortgage so we can clear the stain on the title. 15 U.S. Code 1639g, states : - Requests for payoff amounts of home loan. A creditor or servicer of a home loan shall send an accurate payoff balance within a reasonable time, but in no case more than 7 business days, after the receipt of a written request for such balance from or on behalf of the borrower. In fact the attorneys for the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and its servicer, XXXX, Attorney XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX and Attorney XXXX XXXX, have mislead courts on a material factual matter, to wit : they in fact had the required authorization to provide a payoff letter, whether for use in an assumption or for the Plaintiff to get an outside loan, and made a material misstatement of fact that they could not provide a pay off letter. This violates federal law as shown above.
10/18/2017 No
  • Debt collection
  • Mortgage debt
  • False statements or representation
  • Attempted to collect wrong amount
  • IL
  • 60016
Web
XXXX from XXXX XXXX to complaint number XXXX was not satisfactory they need to supply proof as requested in my complaint number. Summary judgment was not granted and there is a counter suit against XXXX XXXX for filing a fraudulent complaint. They are lying through their teeth.
08/19/2022 Yes
  • Debt collection
  • Mortgage debt
  • False statements or representation
  • Attempted to collect wrong amount
  • IN
  • 46628
Web Older American, Servicemember
09/25/2017 Yes
  • Debt collection
  • Mortgage debt
  • False statements or representation
  • Attempted to collect wrong amount
  • IL
  • 60016
Web
09/26/2016 Yes
  • Mortgage
  • Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)
  • Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
  • WI
  • 53950
Phone
12/19/2014 Yes
  • Mortgage
  • Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)
  • Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
  • WI
  • 54025
Referral Older American