HarrisLoftus, PLLC CFPB Complaints

Back to Dashboard
2000 Latest Complaints
Date Received Timely Response Product Issue State / Zip Submitted Via Tags
11/16/2023 Yes
  • Debt collection
  • I do not know
  • Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
  • Sued you without properly notifying you of lawsuit
  • VA
  • 229XX
Web
1. Comes Now, Executor of the Precedent Vested Estate XXXX XXXX, with power of attorney here to settle all matters dealing with the principal debtor. As an Investor of the United States, Certificated Security Holder of the principal debtor/Franchise/Cestui que Trust. XXXX XXXX, I have dominion over all rights/interest of the principal debtor, all enjoyments, proceeds, titles, deeds, bonds, chattel papers and securities are due unto me as I have the right of subrogation as the holder in due course. By protestation not confessing or acknowledging all or any of the matters and things in the said bill of complaints contained, to be true, in such manner and form as the same are therein and thereby set forth and alleged, I demur to said bill, and for cause of my demurrer shows, that your claim holds no substance in law there is no injured party here to make any claim under penalty and perjury in law. Nor do I have the original bill of particular/presentment in order to do equity or carry out the commercial duties of the Precedent vested Estate. 2. Can you show proof of your authority/possession of the Certificated Security of the principal debtor in order to legislate over any property of the principal debtor? I am here for all securities and chattel papers of this account/case, can you produce the original bill of presentment so that I may do equity and transfer all securities and chattel papers to you to settle all obligations of this mutual account? 3. This matter has created a constructive trust by you taking private property of the Precedent vested Estate and using it in the public to settle the public interest without just compensation to the Precedent Estate. Whereas I now accept all securities in equity as redemption. I accept all charges on the accounts and I am releasing/assigning all claims and transferring all chattel papers and securities of the principal debtor and appointing you as fiduciary to settle charges within the Public and Private of this mutual account immediately. 4. If you choose not to do equity then there is no sufficient claim, and there is no injured party with a claim under penalty and perjury therefore the court order is null and void. This case is either satisfied or nullified there are no other eventualities. You are attempting a distortion and robbery of all chattel papers and securities, within the misuse of the Social Security Account of the Precedent Estate with your aggressive approach with deception, misrepresentation, Fraud and threats of garnishments and fines in which you do not have an injured party to make a claim against the Precedent vested Estate. Your violations are pursuant to 42 USC 408. 5. WHEREAS As all government entities and alleged private corporations must be a creature of the American Constitution, this is a formal Request and Command for you to produce for the record, the Legislative Act that created your Authority to 1 ) enforce an instrument you are not in possession of, 2 ) or to enforce an instrument that was destroyed by way of securitization a voluntary act to discharge all debt. 3 ) Prove your authority to legislate over the Property of the Precedent Estate. Take notice that a de facto basis for powers of authority is not sufficient in this matter. Failure to provide proof of your de jure authority constitutes your actions as ultra vires and by operation of law your Bond/Charter is dissolved by usurping powers you do not have, a trust arises, and I become beneficiary of said trust. As beneficiary to your dissolution, I special deposit for credit on account and order all debts be paid from your capital stock. 6. Claiming there is an alleged debt when the Bill/note was destroyed by way of securitization therefore fully discharging all debt between parties according to U.C.C 3-604 ( a ) A person entitled to enforce an instrument, with or without consideration, may discharge the obligation of a party to pay the instrument ( i ) by an intentional voluntary act, such as surrender of the instrument to the party, destruction, mutilation, or cancellation of the instrument, cancellation or striking out of the party 's signature, or the addition of words to the instrument indicating discharge, or ( ii ) by agreeing not to sue or otherwise renouncing rights against the party by a signed record. This is fraud and misrepresentation of the material facts, the character and legal amount of debt. This is an ultra vires act, usurping powers that are not within your charter/Bond nor authorized by law. Any false representation of material facts made with knowledge of falsity and with intent that it shall be acted on by another in entering into contract, and which is so acted upon, constitutes fraud, and entities party deceived to avoid contract or recover damages. XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX F XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX said : The doctrine of ultra vires is a most powerful weapon to keep private corporations within their legitimate spheres and to punish them for violations of their corporate charters, and it probably is not invoked to often. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. Conclusion : Do you have the original bill of particular/presentment ( negotiable instrument ) in your possession to enforce the instrument to seek payments of a debt? Can you prove that you did not discharge all debts by destroying the original bill of particular/presentment by way of securitization? Do you have the certificated security instrument issued by the United States to show proof of possession over the principal debtor for subrogation rights over all proceeds of the principal debtor. 8. If you can not provide proof of possession of the original bill of presentment to enforce the instrument to seek payments of debt according to UCC 3-301 or provide proof the original bill of presentment was not destroyed by way of securitization, I demand for this case to be discharged with prejudice immediately and all obligations are fully satisfied. I pray to be discharged with reasonable costs of my labor and service in this behalf sustained. 9. Fees for Services : See Fee Schedule Attached 1. Summons, Court Notices without XXXX {$10000.00} 2. Responsive Communication {$250.00} a page= 4 pages {$1000.00} 3. Review and Research for responsive communications XXXX XXXXhour Total= {$11000.00} 1. You now have 5 days to fully answer and or rebut all claims that has been made within this affidavit and show proof of your possession of the original bill and or you did not destroy the bill by way of securitization. If you choose not to answer I will assume you have XXXX all debts and fully settled this mutual account. Be fully aware your silence is accepted as consent and a Quo warranto will be filed for you ultra vires acts against the Public Interest if you choose to pursue this matter any further. I will be filing IRS FORMS F56, 709 United States Gift Tax, 1099A, 1099B, to Report Taxes of this particular matter. I declare under penalty and perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. 28 USC 1746 Executor Office, XXXX XXXX, Precedent Estate, non-citizen, National of the United States, Certificated Security Holder Power of Attorney in Fact
04/26/2023 Yes
  • Debt collection
  • I do not know
  • False statements or representation
  • Attempted to collect wrong amount
  • VA
  • 23112
Web Servicemember
My husband and I contacted XXXX and XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX regarding a garnishment that had been placed on my husbands wages. We had a tax lien against his wages that was already in place and taking 100 % of his income. We called to discuss the opportunity to make payment arrangements and reached a representative named XXXX. We discussed the entire situation with her and the fact that we knew the tax lien was not going to take 100 % of our next paycheck and wanted to see if we could set up a payment plan so we wouldn't loose 25 % of our income on top of what the tax levy took from our XX/XX/XXXX paycheck. And then 25 % of all paychecks from XX/XX/XXXX - XX/XX/XXXX. XXXX agreed to a payment plan of {$300.00} a month with our first payment to begin on XX/XX/XXXX. We specifically asked about what would happen once the tax levy had been satisfied and if our wages would be garnished at the 25 % amount from that point forward. She advised that based on the communication received from my husband 's employer that no wages would be withheld between our conversation on XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX. That if we made the {$300.00} a month payments as agreed they would not refile the garnishment on XX/XX/XXXX. Our wages were garnished on XX/XX/XXXX {$320.00} and on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX. We began calling XXXX and XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX requesting that the call from XX/XX/XXXX be pulled and listened to as we felt we had been misinformed and that we had made payment arrangements to our utility providers based on what we had been told. We are also facing eviction as we have not been able to make full rent payments. We made calls nearly everyday for the last two weeks leaving voicemail messages and requests for the call from XX/XX/XXXX to be pulled to see if we could come to any type of agreement. Finally, on XX/XX/XXXX the day before payday we began calling several times an hour trying to get some sort of information or resolution based on the fact that we had proceeded based on incorrect information provided by the representative at the law office. We were routinely sent to VM over and over and left messages that were never returned. On XX/XX/XXXX at approximately XXXX pm we received a phone call from XXXX, whom we had originally spoken with and she was incredibly aggressive and informed us that despite multiple requests and promises from the staff at XXXX XXXX the call from XX/XX/XXXX had still not been pulled. She said she remembered the phone call and that there was nothing they would do. She said we were harassing the staff and was yelling and speaking over us consistently throughout the call. We explained that it wasn't our intention to harass staff however we didn't know what else to do as we had been calling for two weeks leaving messages and no one was returning our calls. We were at a point of absolute desperation and needed help. When we again asked if the call had been pulled and reviewed, we were told no it had not been. Her supervisor XXXX XXXX, also stated that he would " try '' to pull the call and get back with us in a few days. We explained that we were in a state of crisis and that we needed to have the call pulled today and if possible some kind of agreement reached. We never heard back from XXXX, however, that is when XXXX called and was aggressive and hostile from the instant we initiated the call. When she began yelling at us we were trying to clarify if we were on a recorded line at which time she said she was ending the call and essentially hung up on us. Our complaint is that not only were we misinformed by their representative but we were also treated with disregard - not having a single call/message returned. Once we were able to speak to someone we were treated with aggression, and hostility including being yelled at for asking for help based on being misinformed.
10/27/2023 Yes
  • Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports
  • Credit reporting
  • Incorrect information on your report
  • Public record information inaccurate
  • DC
  • 20032
Web
Today ( XXXX XXXX ) I submitted an application for an apartment, and to my surprise I was decline. It stated I was being decline due to XXXX reporting a Civil Court Record by XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX that was filed on XX/XX/XXXX and judgement date on XX/XX/XXXX. I was unaware I even had a judgement. I quickly contacted the Silver Collection Property Manager ( XXXX XXXX ) and she confirmed that I have a {$0.00} balance and provided me with my general ledger with the Silver Collection as of XX/XX/XXXX ( please see attachments ) that shows from XX/XX/XXXX through XX/XX/XXXX I have fulfilled my monthly rent during my tenure at this property. And I was never evicted from the XXXX XXXX. So, I don't understand how a judgement was entered on XX/XX/XXXX and I still reside at the property until the end of my lease on XXXX XXXX.
05/19/2023 Yes
  • Debt collection
  • Auto debt
  • Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
  • Sued you without properly notifying you of lawsuit
  • VA
  • 20111
Web
Garnishing wages in the sum of XXXX after collections was already taken by previous debt collection. Sent notice of garnishment to wrong address after the original company has new address and has not communicated since debt being written off, original loan company refused to collect collateral of debt and garnished wages instead.
12/16/2023 Yes
  • Debt collection
  • Payday loan debt
  • False statements or representation
  • Impersonated attorney, law enforcement, or government official
  • MD
  • 217XX
Web Servicemember
09/11/2023 Yes
  • Debt collection
  • Credit card debt
  • Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
  • Sued you without properly notifying you of lawsuit
  • VA
  • 22554
Web
09/02/2023 Yes
  • Debt collection
  • Credit card debt
  • Written notification about debt
  • Didn't receive enough information to verify debt
  • MD
  • 20785
Web
02/05/2023 Yes
  • Debt collection
  • Payday loan debt
  • False statements or representation
  • Attempted to collect wrong amount
  • VA
  • 20148
Web
01/23/2023 Yes
  • Debt collection
  • Other debt
  • Attempts to collect debt not owed
  • Debt was paid
  • VA
  • 22031
Web
08/16/2022 Yes
  • Debt collection
  • Other debt
  • Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
  • Sued you without properly notifying you of lawsuit
  • VA
  • 22031
Web
01/22/2021 Yes
  • Debt collection
  • Payday loan debt
  • Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
  • Sued you without properly notifying you of lawsuit
  • VA
  • 22305
Web
01/22/2021 Yes
  • Debt collection
  • Payday loan debt
  • Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
  • Sued you without properly notifying you of lawsuit
  • VA
  • 22305
Web