| 05/18/2022 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- Attempts to collect debt not owed
- Debt is not yours
|
|
Web |
Servicemember |
|
Agreed to remove a debt that was caused by identity theft.
Failed to investigate identity theft Agreed to remove item from credit report because they could not provide a copy of a contract with my signature. Item removed from report and the record will show from my previous complaint onXXXX XX/XX/2021. On the record XXXX agreed too remove the items and out of spite passed the item to XXXX law firm that filed a lawsuit in a state that I do not reside in. All 3 parties are conspiring on XXXX and XXXX people to try and stiff arm them to pay a bill that does not belong to that person. All three parties should also be dealt with by the FTC.
Besides the above issues the credit card debt in which they have filed against me is in a state that I do not reside in. I have not resided in that state in the past 7 years. The state in which I resides only allows three years to collect on a credit card debt from the time in which it was delinquent. The statue of limitation for my state that I reside is 3 years and that 3 years have passed by.
XXXX, Dimand Law, and XXXX XXXX Consultant are running an deceptive STRONG ARM enterprise trying to strong arm XXXX and XXXX people for credit cards that were a result of ID theft. All three parties need to be reported to the FTC immediately because all 3 are deceptive in nature. I clearly told XXXX at Dimand Law that I do not reside in the state of Illinois and gage pursued a lawsuit any way.
|
| 04/03/2022 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
- Sued you in a state where you do not live or did not sign for the debt
|
|
Web |
Servicemember |
|
I informed Dimand Law PC ( XXXX XXXX ) that this lawsuit was out of spite because it did not not belong to me it was fraud. XXXX and XXXX lied about the removal of the negative item and erroneous ; y reinserted the item through a lawsuit, Sent a copy of the complaint showing that XXXX agreed to remove the information from my report. Law firm ignored my rights and pursued the lawsuit. I do not live in XXXX XXXX Illinois and I informed them of that and they still pursued the lawsuit. They sent law enforcement as well as debt processor to an address that I do not reside causing an alarm in the neighborhood. Residence in the neighborhood are on high alert due to the actions of Dimand PC, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX. All three entitys are running a criminal enterprise preying on XXXX XXXX XXXX people by trying to collect on old charged off credit cards debts.
|
| 04/25/2022 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
- Sued you in a state where you do not live or did not sign for the debt
|
|
Web |
Servicemember |
|
Filed a lawsuit in XXXX XXXX Illinois on a fraud account and I do not reside in XXXX XXXX or even the state of Illinois I informed them about the above actions and they are more concerned about collecting money that I do not owe. I have not answered to any lawsuit nor have I been served because I do not live in Illinois and I have conveyed that to Dimand Law firm This law firm along with key note collections tend to pray on poor XXXX and XXXX people in XXXX XXXX Illinois they flood the court system with XXXX and XXXX people with the notion of strong arming, embarrassing and con-Ing poor XXXX and XXXX people XXXX
I have never signed a contract for a credit card and there is no proof that I have. This law firm operates shady practices targeting poor XXXX and XXXX people and should be dealt with by the FTC.
|
| 03/30/2022 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
- Sued you in a state where you do not live or did not sign for the debt
|
|
Web |
Servicemember |
|
Inform this law firm that the account did not belong to me Informed Dimand law firm that I do not reside in Illinois any more Inform the attorney that this matters was resolved with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and it was removed from my credit report as fraud Still decided to sue me in XXXX XXXX XXXX for a debt I do not own Trying to sue me and collect income that is protected XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX and that income is protected and they are still pursuing me
|
| 02/06/2023 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- False statements or representation
- Impersonated attorney, law enforcement, or government official
|
|
Web |
|
|
|
| 03/28/2022 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Credit card debt
|
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
- Sued you in a state where you do not live or did not sign for the debt
|
|
Web |
Servicemember |
|
|