07/18/2017 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- Auto debt
|
- Attempts to collect debt not owed
- Debt is not yours
|
|
Web |
|
ASSET ACQUISITION GROUP , LLC, has created another judgement against me. A case between this collector was back in XX/XX/XXXX in the Sate of Florida ( case : XXXX ) and the case was dismissed. ASSET ACQUISITION GROUP , LLC created a judgement in XXXX in New Jersey which I never knew about. Then created a judgement in XXXX and lost the case. On XX/XX/XXXX ASSET ACQUISITION GROUP , LLC, create a new judgement against me in New York. This is the first judgement by ASSET ACQUISITION GROUP , LLC that I was notified. Since this is the first time ASSET ACQUISITION GROUP , LLC notified me legally in XX/XX/XXXX that is when the collector has tried to collect on an old auto debt passed the Statue of Limitations. This is a new judgement against me XX/XX/XXXX and this debt is from XXXX .
Due to Lack of Privity I have no relationship between ASSET ACQUISITION GROUP , LLC and never signed a contract or agreement with ASSET ACQUISITION GROUP , LLC.
This judgement is a Failure Of Consideration due to the fact that I have never entered into any contractual or debtor/creditor arrangements with ASSET ACQUISITION GROUP , LLC.
ASSET ACQUISITION GROUP , LLC state hat my credit application had XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX , XXXX , New Jersey XXXX however I had never lived there. Also ASSET ACQUISITION GROUP , LLC states that they served me at that same address in XXXX however I have never lived there. The Plaintiff has no proof of that address and my social security number associated with that address.There are several XXXX XXXX XXXX within the state of New Jersey.
|
08/03/2015 |
Yes |
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Sued w/o proper notification of suit
|
|
Web |
Servicemember |
I was sued for an old debt that was acquired by Asset Acquisitions Group out of XXXX Colorado. The debt collector did n't properly notify me of the debt. According to the court records, this company was already planning a lawsuit for this debt. This collector acquired this debt in XXXX of 2012 and by XXXX of that same year had already filed papers to sue me. According to the court records, I was served with papers on this debt and in XXXX, a judgement was filed against me. To my surprise this judgement was entered on a debt that was for {$9000.00} that has now swelled to about {$23000.00}. If the company had reached out prior to all of these actions validating this debt we could have reached an agreement and I would n't have a {$23000.00} judgement on my credit report.
|
08/18/2021 |
No |
- Debt collection
- Auto debt
|
- False statements or representation
- Attempted to collect wrong amount
|
|
Web |
|
|
03/22/2016 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- I do not know
|
- Disclosure verification of debt
- Right to dispute notice not received
|
|
Web |
|
|
12/14/2015 |
Yes |
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Threatened to sue on too old debt
|
|
Phone |
|
|
07/02/2015 |
Yes |
- Debt collection
- I do not know
|
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
- Threatened to sue on too old debt
|
|
Web |
|
|